Living Visigothic Nobility

The Visigothic Name, Territory, and Dynasty remains in the titles of the Nobility of France. The peerage of France (highest ranking equal princes) have several hereditary princes of this realm, using the claim as the larger Province called "Languedoc". Read the booklet by Jean Lafitte and article entitled "Languedoc, déformation de *Land Goth ?". Dynastically it is also demonstratably preserved (as I give a taste below). The Visigothic family succession was preserved from the original Balti Dynasty via the Visigothic Princess Brunhilda, Grandmother of Pepin (and other Visigothic Nobles), thus transferring the rights to the Franks, later to the Dynastic descendants known as Counts of Toulouse and Princes of Gothia for an additional 800 years. The original Gothia (Visigoth) land realm remains in the name "Langeudoc" (Land of the Goths / Langue de Goth), according to numerous authentic records, encyclopedias, etc. Today you also can look it up on any map. Whether they call their territory Langeudoc or Gothia makes no difference, as all agree it is the same place, same tribe, and just a different spelling. It was continued legally through the female Visigoth Genealogy, also as a title "Gothia", and later the same region colloquially as Languedoc. For most of the generations it remained within the government of the Toulouse Nobility. It then passed to their heir Philip III who was of the earlier Capetian Dynasty, and down through all the French Kings till today. We know the House of Bourbon, Cadet branch of the Capetian dynasty has held the original grants with the name "Gothia" as per the general history books (one as attached in the graphic). The original territory reached the French Kings by first passing from the Visigothic Princess Brunhilda. She passed it to her heirs, and to the Merovingian King Pepin, see: https://gw.geneanet.org/belfast8?lang=en&p=brunhilda+of+toledo&n=germany . As in the attached image, the whole of Gothia passed rightfully(legally) Dynastically down from Bernard I to his heirs, down to this present day all concretely. Not only the Kings protected all such titles of the province, the dukes and counts also never not ever renounced this legal entity known as Languedoc nor disbanded it in any way. Their claims of this illustrious decent or renounce any rights to this entity. This was all long settled. Things only became a little shaky with the Napoleanic usurpation during the French Revolution. The Brunswick Manifesto was to restore the French King to all his rightful titles, of which Napoleon refused. Therefore Brunswick made good on all promises, as commander-in-chief over all Prussia, commander-in-chief over all Austria and commander-in-chief (in war time) of de jure France(as granted by the rightful King of France giving Brunswick the additional authority in France). Note that Brunswick also has the living title Prince of Gottingen (Gothia) as a Dynastic inheritance, which remains a sub-principality under the duchy of Brunswick and Lunenburg, with this same Prince ranking higher (during war time) than all three Emperors. This begun the war for the French King to be restored under all original rightful titles.

Proof the Sovereign Prince of Gothia Founded the Templar Order. The First Templars Were Recorded a Generation Before First GrandMaster, under the Princely Titles of Gothia

The first two Templar Grandmasters were of the house of Anjou which we have demonstrated were kin of the Royal House of Gothia. Although not directly Knights of Gothia, they clearly were in league with their cousin, the "Prince of Gothia". The title of Gothia was held prominently by Raymond IV the more ancient title of the Visigoths, which he used alongside his title of Count of Toulouse (highest rank of a Monarch in France). His family long intermarried with the Nobility of Aquitaine and Anjou, of which there were competing lines of succession. Raymond VII of Gothia is well regarded as the most senior leader of the First Crusade, bringing the most Knights to the holy land than any other (more than 100,000). This was at the time the order was founded at Jerusalem. In this article we will get into the historical records which specify more on the founding of the Templar a whole generation before the popular version of the first two Grandmasters Hugh de Payens and Robert de Craon. 

Coincidentally several other Goths' states with the title of Gothia were the bloodrights of Otto IV of Brunswick who was endowed with the Duchy of Aquitaine and Anjou by his Uncle King Richard. Not many followed it, and he was too busy ruling Germany as the Holy Roman Emperor, which had a civil war where he was unable to go and collect the complete titles of Angevin Emperor. However, it's worth to point out he (and his descendants) are the blood relatives of the Angevin Dynastic throne of Jerusalem, and have rights to the throne. Then by this bestowment he and his descendants are also the legitimate Chiefs of the House of Angevin, which was usurped by the Capetian House. However Brunswick to this day still uses the coat of Arms of Aquitaine, and during the French Revolution the Duke of Brunswick was made Commander-in-Chief of France by the de jure King of France before he was beheaded. 

The evidence points however, that a Prince of Gothia founded the earliest known Templar Knights. It was in 1096 the highest and eldest Prince to lead the First Crusade, bearing the title  "Marqis of Gothia" (translated princeps Gothiæ).

This is about his role in founding the Templar Order while fighting for the Byzantine Emperor.

The evidence is quite conclusive on the early founding of the order being at least the fruit of, if not the direct advice of this Gothian Prince. Gothia being the main hereditary title of his family. He was accredited in the earlier writings as founding the original Order of Knights Templar.

Most French Knights were long known to be the subjects of Gothian Nobility, whether by the main Septimanian/Toulouse Branch or the many other Noble families who married into this Gothian/Visigothic House.
Even the Frankish King Pepin had a claim to the Gothian title. This Germanic tribal foundation was well understood then, though little understood now.

The main realms of France were all led by equal Princes as "peers of France". Therefore all the Knights who joined the original Templar are pretty well guaranteed to have had Gothian allegiances and blood ties. Historians and experts agree to use the term prince for all such ranking "peers of France" as there was no differentiation of rank.

The early order of Templar didn't grant "knighthoods" as we know them today although they were of an elevated status with multiple charters of Royal houses. Sovereign Knights themselves means they are under a Monarch firstly (whether the monarch of Jerusalem) or during a vacancy of a Monarch in Jerusalem or in other states, this may be a Regent. 

The Templar of the first generations who joined the Templar were under absolute authority of their Monarchs who all fought for Christ. One of these Chiefly was the Royalty of Gothia. 

According to the below record, we also find that the Templar order was founded no later than 1099 by multiple Gothian princes.

This was more than 30 years before the pope endorsed the Templar order of Knights.

This was a full generation before the First "so-called" Grandmaster Hugh de Paynes had even reached puberty. Therefore he could not have been the first Grandmaster as we all have been told. Although he too was a Knight that was under Gothian Nobility.

The Gothian Prince Raymond was then the oldest fighting Monarch in the Holy Land. He had fought the Muslims for much of his life, kicking them out of Europe. He was the main Royal who was accredited with the capture of Jerusalem in the First Crusade. He was a Peer of France (an equal rank of highest King), and was the Count of Toulouse among many other high Noble titles.

Upon conquering Jerusalem, he was offered to be crowned "King of Jerusalem", however he wanted to remain fighting and so nominated his peer, Godfrey de Boullion, to be the first Crusader King.

As we read in this authentic historical record of Simon de St. Bertin. This text was written, Circa 1135-7. The following is part of the entry for the year 1099, after the capture of Jerusalem and the crowning of Godfrey de Bouillon as King of Jerusalem.

"While he [Godfrey] was reigning magnificently, some had decided not to return to the shadows of the world after suffering such dangers for God's sake. On the advice of the princes of God's army they vowed themselves to God's Temple under this rule: they would renounce the world, give up personal goods, free themselves to pursue purity, and lead a communal life wearing a poor habit, only using arms to defend the land against the attacks of the insurgent pagans when necessity demanded."

There are many other authentic writings from early in the 12th Century but none allude to the actual founding of the order.

Raymond was the only one of the leading Crusaders who refused to do homage to the emperor Alexius for their expected conquests. Therefore it seems more fitting one of the other Nobles would have finally accepted the crown which would only have been legally placed by the Emperor Alexius Commenus, the one whom they were fighting for.

In the time when Godfrey was "reigning magnificently" would have been when he was busy liberating the Orthodox areas, in a great assistance to the Byzantine Empire against the Muslims. This would have been between 1096 and no later than the time of his death in 1100. As he only was King of Jerusalem for less than one year before his death. While Raymond IV, prince of Gothia lived another six years.

As we read it was these Gothian Knights, "After suffering such dangers for God's sake" it is really pointing to the much longer campaigns carried out by the elder Gothian Prince Raymond who had fought the Muslims in longer campaigns. This all dates to near the time of the original capture of Jerusalem, making it 1099 the latest date for the founding of the original Gothian Templar Knights.

Image from Volume 13, page 321 "The Penny Cyclopaedia of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful ...,"

Successors of the Imperial and Royal House of Gothia

LEGAL SUCCESSORS OF THE BILLUNG ROYAL DYNASTIC HOUSE OF THE GOTHS IN SAXONY, AS THE DUKES AND EMPERORS OF GERMANY (OF THE OSTROGOTHS)

AND

SUCCESSORS OF THE PRINCIPALITY OF GOTHIA IN TOULOUSE LANDS OF SPAIN AND FRANCE (OF THE VISIGOTHS)

AND

THESE TWO LINES, VISIGOTH AND OSTROGOTH WERE UNITED IN OTTO IV, THE DUKE OF BRUNSWICK, WHO WAS CROWNED EMPEROR OF THE HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE

AND

THE CONTINUAL PROTECTIONS OF CRIMEAN GOTHIA

for full article go to: http://orthodoxchurch.nl/2018/08/ostrogoth-and-visigoth-united-royal-successor-house-brunswick-wolfenbuettel/

or go here to download the article in PDF format: 

http://orthodoxchurch.nl/ostrogoth-Billung-and-visigoth-toulouse-dual-succession-Royal-Dynasty-of-the-Goths.pdf

Brunswick shut down freemasonry, declared the Illuminati, enemies of humanity and of the state.

Brunswick shut down freemasonry, declared the Illuminati, enemies of humanity and of the state.

Clearly most of the Dukes of Brunswick were not Freemasons. In fact, after a period of 18 years after founding the German Freemasonry as an order of the state, Brunswick ordered no quarter given to any involved in the illuminati, and even outlawed Freemasonry itself. In the below letter, you can read the formal edict of 1794 by the ruling Imperial prince, the duke of Brunswick, for the immediate end of ALL German Freemasonry, as to ensure there would be no power given to the very evil Illuminati:

“I have been convinced that we, as an Order, have come under the power of some very evil occult Order, profoundly versed in science, both occult and otherwise, though not infallible, their methods being black magic, that is to say, electromagnetic power, hypnotism, and powerful suggestion. We are convinced that the Order is being controlled by some Sun Order, after the nature of the Illuminati, if not by that Order itself. We see our edifice…crumbling and covering the ground with ruins, we see the destruction that our hands no longer arrest…a great sect arose, which taking for its motto the good and the happiness of man, worked in the darkness of the conspiracy to make the happiness of humanity a prey for itself.

This sect is known to everyone, its brothers are known no less than its name. It is they who have undermined the foundations of the Order to the point of complete overthrow; it is by them that all humanity has been poisoned and led astray for several generations…They began by casting odium on religion…Their masters had nothing less in view than the thrones of the earth, and the governments of the nations was to be directed by their nocturnal clubs…the misuse of our order…has produced all the political and moral troubles with which the world is filled today…we must from this moment dissolve the whole Order.” Duke of Brunswick, Grand Master of German Freemasonry, Knights Templar Order of Strict Observance 1794

For this measure the house has suffered greatly. The junior branch of Hanover later crept in after about a dozen ruling dukes were killed one oafter the other. Orphaned Karl II cited the law, of Hanover's unlawful usurpation in his edict to regain all what has been stolen from the people of Germany by Napoleon's, Prussia's, Austria's and Britain's raids. As ruling sovereign His official edicts and the seven principalities of the duchy of Brunswick, remain sovereign to this day (in the structure protected in custodianship at Geneva Switzerland), so that nothing of the duchy may fall into the hands of Prussia, France, or of Hanover, as explicitly prescribed to the agnates of Karl II, and recognized by numerous international bodies.

Anything else is a lie no doubt perpetrated by the Illuminati, as many corrupt officials joined with against Germany's true Royal and Imperial house, Wolfenbuttel-Brunswick. 

Note the House of Wolfenbuttel-Brunswick does not claim the newly created 19th Century Council of Vienna entities. These are not of any interest of the house, and has continually protested against the unlawful usurpations by Hanover or Prussia over the Wolfenbuttel-Brunswick domains. 

Visit our Order's Facebook Group for all the latest information

https://www.facebook.com/groups/GothianTemplar/



Visit our Order's Facebook Group for all the latest information

The Interim Constitution, passed by all Gothian Electors. And sealed by all Provincial Grand Commanders of the GIKT

Ambrose von Sievers, Archbishop of Gothia

+ Ambrose von Sievers, of the Metropolitanate of Gothia is a Bishop of the True Orthodox Church (Russian Catacomb Church). It is the successive church that has escaped the persecutions of the Bolsheviks and their successive agents. His church is considered in some circles as non-canonical because of it's refusal to submit to the KGB installed church. As the escaped Andrewite Bishop did canonically consecrate +Ambrose, it is believed therefore the church of the Goths is truly canonical unlike many other jurisdictions. However, the persecutions have continued, as the Clergy have been attacked and killed over the last two generations. 

The Apostolic Succession of Archbishop Ambrose von Sievers (two main lines)

Russian Orthodox Line Russian Orthodox line  Jesus Christ + Andrew, the Apostle of our Lord. Founded 38 Stachys, the Disciple, one of the 70 Apostles. 38 - 54 Onesimos 54 - 68 Polykarpos 69 - 89 Ploutarchos 89 - 105 Sedekion 105 - 114 Diogenes 114 - 129 Eleftherios 129 - 136 Felix 136 - 141 Polykarpos II 141 - 144 Athenodoros 144 - 148 Euzoios 148 - 154 Laurentios 154 - 166 Alypios 166 - 169 Pertinax 169 - 187 Olympianos 187 - 198 Markos I 198 - 211 Philadelphos 211 - 214 Kyriakos I 214 - 230 Kastinos 230 - 237 Eugenios I 237 - 242 Titos 242 - 272 Dometios 272 - 303 Roufinos 303 Provos 303 - 315 Metrophanes I 315 - 325 Alexandros 325 - 340 Paulos I, the Confessor 340 - 41, 342 - 34, 348 - 50 Eusebios 341 - 342 Makedonios I 344 - 348, 350 - 360 Eudoxios 360 - 369 Demophilos 369 - 379 Evagrios 379 Maximos I 380 Gregory, the Theologian 379 - 381 Nectarios 381 - 397 John I, the Chrysostom 398 - 404 Arsakios 404 - 405 Attikos 406 - 425 Sisinios I 425 – 427 Nestorios 428 - 431 Maximianos 431 - 434 Proklos 434 - 447 Flavianos 447 - 449 Anatolios 449 - 458 Gennadios I 458 - 471 Akakios 471 - 489 Favritas (Fravitas) 489 - 490 Euphemios 490 - 496 Makedonios II 496 - 511 Timotheos I 511 - 518 John II, the Cappadocian 518 - 520 Epiphanios 520 - 536 Anthimos 535 - 536 Menas 536 - 552 Eutychios I 552 - 565, 577 - 582 John III 566 - 577 Eutychios II 577 - 582 John IV, the Faster 582 - 595 Kyriakos II 595 - 607 Thomas I 607 - 610 Sergios I 610 - 638 Pyrros I (later returned as Pyrros II) 638 - 641 Paulos II 641 - 652 Pyrros II [same as Pyrros I] 652 or 654 Petros 652 - 664 Thomas II 665 - 668 John V 668 - 674 Constantine I 674 - 676 Theodoros I 676 - 678, 683 - 686 Georgios I 678 - 683 Paulos III 686 - 693 Kallinikos I 693 - 705 Kyros 705 - 711 John VI 711 - 715 Germanos I, the Confessor 715 - 730 Anastasios 730 - 751 Constantine II 754 - 766 Niketas, the Slav 766 - 780 Paulos IV 780 - 784 Tarasios 784 - 806 Nikephoros I 806 - 815 Theodotos, Melissenos 815 - 821 Antonios I, Kasymatas 821 - 826 John VII the Grammatikos 826 - 842 Methodios I, the Confessor 842 - 846 Ignatios I, the Prince 846 - 857, 867 - 878 Photios I 857 - 867, 878 - 886 Stephanos I, the Prince 886 - 893 Antonios II, Kavleas 893 - 895 Nikolaos I, the Mystic 895 - 906, 911 - 925 Euthymios I 906 - 911 Stephanos II 925 - 928 Tryphon 928 - 931 Theophylctos, Lakapenos, the Princeling 933 - 956 Polyeuctos 956 - 970 Vasilios I, Skamandrenos 970 - 974 Antonios III, Skandalios, also Stoudites 974 - 980 Nikolaos II, Chrysoverges 984 – 995 Leo Michael, the Syrian 991-1004 Leontius 1004-1015 John I 1015-1037 Theopemptus 1037-1051 Hilarion 1051- ? George 1072-1080 John II 1080-1096 John III 1096-1098 Ephraim 1096-1098 Nicolas 1098-1108 Nicephorus I 1108-1124 Nicetas 1124-1127 Micahel II 1127-1147 Clement 1147-1154 Constantine 1154-1160 Theodore 1160-1164 John IV 1164-1167 Constantine II 1167-1185 Nicephorus II 1185-1201 Matthew 1201-1205 Cyril I 1205-1237 Joseph 1237-? Cyril II 1240-1281 Metropolitans of Vladimir and of All Russia Maximus 1283-1305 Peter 1305-1328 As Archbishops of Moscow and of All Russia Theognostes 1328-1352 Alexis 1254-1378 Cyprian 1381-1407 Photius 1408-1431 Isodore 1436-1441 Jonah 1448-1461 Theodosius 1462-1467 Phillip I 1467-1472 Gerontius 1472-1491 Zosimus 1491-1496 Simon 1495-1510 Barlaam 1511-1521 Daniel 1522-1539 Joasaph 1539-1542 Macarius 1542-1563 Germanus 1564-1565 Phillip 1565-1568 Cyril II I 1568-1572 Anthony 1572-1581 Dionysius 1582-1587 Patriarchs of Moscow and of All Russia Job 1589-1605 Hemongenes 1606-1612 Philaret 1619-1633 Joasaph I 1633-1641 Joseph 1642-1653 Nicon 1653-1667 Joasaph II 1667-1672 Pitrim 1672-1673 Joachim 1674-1690 Adrain 1690-1700 Stephan 1700-1721 Joseph 1742-1745 Plato 1745-1754 Hilarion of Krutitsy, Coadjutor 1754-1757 Timothy 1757-1767 Ambrosius 1768-1771 Samouel of Krutitsy, Coadjutor 1771-1775 Plato II 1775-1811 Augustin 1811-1819 Serafim 1819-1821 Filaret 1821-1867(who on December 15, 1840 consecrated his successor) St. Innocent 1868-1879 Palladius Rayev (See Above) Macarius I 1879-1882 Joannicis 1882-1891 Leontii Lebedinskii 1891-1893

Ruling hierarchs of the Diocese of Kazan As Archbishops of Kazan Archbishop St. Gury 1555 to 1563 Reposed in office Archbishop St. Herman (Sadyrev-Polevoy) 1564 to 1567 to Metropolitan of Moscow Archbishop Lavrenty I 1568 to 1574 Reposed in office Archbishop Vassian 1575 Reposed in office Archbishop Tikhon I (Khvorostinin) 1575 to 1576 Reposed in office Archbishop Jeremiah 1576 to 1581 Reposed in office Archbishop Cosmos 1581 to 1583 Reposed in office Metropolitan Tikhon II 1589 Reposed in office As Metropolitan of Kazan and Astrakhan Metropolitan St. Hermogen 1589 to 1606 to Patriarch of All Russia As Metropolitans of Kazan and Sviyazhsk Metropolitan St. Ephraim 1606 to 1613 Reposed in office Metropolitan Matthew 1615 to 1646 Reposed in office Metropolitan Simon 1646 to 1649 Reposed in office Metropolitan Cornelius I 1650 to 1656 Reposed in office Metropolitan Lavrenty II 1657 to 1672 Reposed in office Metropolitan Cornelius II 1673 to 1674 Did not reach Kazan, transferred to Novgorod As Metropolitan of Kazan and Bulgaria Metropolitan Ioasaph 1674 to 1686 Reposed in office As Metropolitan of Kazan Metropolitan Adrian 1686 to 1690 to Patriarch of Moscow Metropolitan Markell 1690 to 1698 Reposed in office Metropolitan Tikhon III (Voinov) 1699 to 1724 Reposed in office Metropolitan Sylvester (Holmsky) 1725 to 1731 deposed Archbishop Hilarion (Rogalevsky) 1732 to 1735 transferred to Chernigov Archbishop Gabriel I (Russkoy) 1735 to 1738 transferred to the Great Ustjug diocese Bishop Luke (Konashevich) 1738 to 1755 transferred to Belgorod Bishop Gavrill II (Kremenetsky) 1755 to 1762 transferred to Kiev as Metropolitan Metropolitan Benjamin (Putsek-Grigotovich) 1762 to 1782 Archbishop Anthony I (Zybelin) 1782 to 1785 Archbishop Amvrosy I (Podobedov) 1785 to 1799 As Archbishops of Kazan and Simbirsk Archbishop Serapion (Alexandrovsky) 1799 to 1803 Archbishop Pavel (Zernov) 1803 to 1815 Archbishop Amvrosy II (Protasov) 1816 to   1826 Archbishop Jonah (Pavinsky) 1826 to 1828 Archbishop Philaret (Amphitheaters) 1828 to 1836 As Archbishops of Kazan and Sviyazhsk Archbishop Vladimir I (Uzhinsky) 1836 to 1848 Metropolitan Gregory (Postnikov) 1848 to 1856 Archbishop Athanasy (Sokolov) 1856 to 1866 Archbishop Anthony II (Amphitheaters) 1866 to 1879 Archbishop Sergei (Lyapidevsky) 1880 to 1882 Archbishop Pallady (Raev-Pisarev) 1882 to 1887 Archbishop Pavel II (Lebedev) 1887 to 1892 Archbishop Vladimir II (Petrov) 1892 to 1897 Archbishop Arseny 1897 to 1903 Archbishop Dimitri I 1903 to 1905

6. In 1897 LEBEDINSKII, Leontii (together with Archbishop Dimitri Sambikin of Kazan) consecrated

KHRAPOVSHY(Khrapovitsky), Antonii. http://glory2godonline.com/docs/apostolic_succession/apostolic_succession.pdf  (In 1900 Antony was made bishop of Ufa, and in 1902 bishop of Volhynia and Zhitomir. Later was President of the Russian Church Abroad) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antony_(Khrapovitsky)

5. In 1905 Khrapovisky, Antonii consecrated

Archbishop Dimitri II (Sambikin), he was Archbishop of Kazan and Sviyazhsk from 1905 to 1908

http://en.orthodoxwiki.org/List_of_bishops_of_the_Diocese_of_Kazan

4. On October 4, 1907, Chief heirarch Dimitri II (Sambikin) consecrated

Hieromartyr Andrew October 4, 1907) he was “consecrated bishop of Mamadysh, the third vicariate of the Kazan diocese”.

http://www.orthodox.net/russiannm/andrew-archbishop-and-hieromartyr-of-ufa.html

3. 1923 St.Andrew and Nicolas Ipatoff in Ufa consecrated

Abbakum (Borovkoff)

2. In 1928 St. Andrew of Ufa with Job (Grechisvkin) consecrated

Amphilochius (Shibanov) as Bishop of Tyumen Diocese. In the period of persecutions, around 1940 he secretly transferred to Transbaikal region and took Tchita cathedra.

His co-consecrator Job (Grechisvkin) was consecrated in 28^th of November 1922 by Andrewites' Bishops Mark Bogolunov and Trophim Yakobchu. he was re-consecrated in 1927 by Andrew and Abbakum in Ufa. Job Grechisvkin is a very important person in the Catacombs. He was martyred in 1940.

http://www.bibliorossica.com/book.html?currBookId=1753

1. In 1994 Amphilochius (Shibanov)

Ambrose von Sievers 1994

Background

1927 AD — Metropolitan Sergius Stragorodsky, a leading Russian bishop, declares the Church to be completely loyal and subject to the antichristian Soviet government. Several bishops throughout Russia protest against this declaration, and are forced underground, thereby forming the Catacomb Church of Russia. The Russian Church Abroad also protests. Sergius' followers later form the "Moscow Patriarchate," created by Stalin in 1943.

1928 AD — Council of Syzran-Yeltz-Vyshny-Volochok in Russia (Nomadic Synod), convened and presided over by Bishop Mark Novoselov, and attended at first by 3 other bishops and 3 priests, each representing a different Catacomb Synod (i.e. Danilovites, Josephites, Andrewites, Victorites, Yaroslavlites, Yedinovertsy, etc). This council condemns the renovationists as well as the sergianists as schismatics, declares them bereft of sacramental grace, and requires their chrismation upon reception into the Church.

+ Ambrose stands in a strict Israelite position! Amphilochius had his Gens' Legend that they have Benjamin origine.

The Gothian Church who represents +Ambrose has two local Bishops: David of Hersones and Dori Hilar of Tamantarchont & Redae.

The Catacomb Church of True Orthodox Christians has 4 Bishops from 1 Gens of Amossoff. It's old Novgorodian Noble Gens. They have Gens Legend of origine from Haggi of Gad's Tribe.